A Comprehensive Resource for Critical Thinking
This guide catalogs 85+ logical fallacies organized into 21 categories. Use it as a tool for identifying flawed reasoning in arguments, debates, media, and public discourse. Understanding these patterns strengthens your ability to think critically and resist manipulation.
Definition: Attacking the person instead of addressing their argument.
Examples:
Valid Exception: When attack goes to credibility of argument (e.g., undermining false claim of expertise)
Related: Needling, Poisoning The Wells, Psychogenetic Fallacy
Definition: Attempting to make opponent angry without addressing argument.
Examples:
Note: Works better if you're running the show or have sympathetic moderator.
Definition: Discrediting sources used by opponent before they're presented.
Examples:
Related: Ad Hominem variation focusing on information sources.
Definition: If you learn psychological reason why opponent likes argument, claim they're biased so argument must be wrong.
Examples:
Valid Use: Understanding motivation ≠ dismissing argument.
Definition: Attacking exaggerated or caricatured version of opponent's position.
Examples:
Definition: Arguing that because scholars debate a point, their entire field is "in crisis" or doesn't exist.
Examples:
Note: Healthy debate ≠ fundamental uncertainty.
Definition: Claiming opponent must be wrong because bad things would ensue if right.
Examples:
Related: Wishful thinking (positive or negative consequences).
Definition: Using emotionally loaded words to sway sentiments instead of minds.
Examples:
Related: Cliche Thinking, Argument By Slogan, Argument By Poetic Language.
Definition: Getting audience to cut you slack based on likability.
Note: Charm creates trust, desire to join winning team, or please speaker.
Definition: "Scientists scoffed at Galileo; they scoff at me; therefore I'm right"
Examples:
Note: Being persecuted doesn't make you right. Galileo was right AND persecuted (not right BECAUSE persecuted).
Definition: Threats or violence as argument.
Examples:
Definition: Being loud as substitute for being right.
Trial Lawyer Rule:
Related: SHOUTING IN ALL CAPS, tantrums to get reputation.
Definition: Assuming only two alternatives when more exist.
Examples:
Related: Short Term vs. Long Term (false choice between addressing crime OR improving schools).
Definition: Over-simplifying complex issues.
Einstein's Rule: "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler"
Examples:
Related: Causal Reductionism.
Definition: Using one cause to explain something with multiple causes.
Example: "Accident was caused by taxi parking in street" (ignoring drunk driver).
Definition: Claiming that whatever hasn't been proved false must be true (or vice versa).
Problems:
Definition: Asking question without snappy answer, making opponent look weak or long-winded.
Example: "How can scientists believe a living cell arose from random processes?"
Note: Usually takes longer to answer question than ask it.
Related: Rhetorical Question, Loaded Question ("Have you stopped beating your wife?").
Definition: Asking question in way that leads to particular answer.
Examples:
Definition: Treating unrelated points as if they should be accepted/rejected together.
Example: "Do you support freedom and the right to bear arms?"
Note: Each point should be evaluated on its own merits.
Definition: "I'm an expert, so trust me"
Problems:
Valid When: Authority is relevant, recent, and verifiable.
Definition: "I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV"
Related: Appeal to unnamed authorities ("experts agree", "they say").
Definition: Claiming "experts agree" without naming them.
Problem: Makes information impossible to verify; may just be spreading rumor.
Definition: Authority outside their area of expertise.
Example: "Physicist John Taylor found no fraud in Uri Geller's psychic feats" (Taylor not qualified to detect stage magic; later admitted being tricked).
Variations:
Definition: "I used to believe X" (implying expertise through having explored it).
Examples:
Problem: Doesn't demonstrate actual expertise.
Definition: Very old (or very young) arguments are superior.
Examples:
Related: Genetic Fallacy (things from particular origin have/lack virtue).
Definition: Ideas from elsewhere are unwelcome; "This is how we've always done it"
Note: Can work in reverse (foreign things held as superior).
Definition: Rejecting idea without saying why.
Examples:
Note: Usually has overtones (hopeless cause, unpatriotic, foreign ideas).
Definition: "Evidence will someday be discovered that proves me right"
Definition: Avoiding defending claim or making good on promise.
Examples:
Related: Argument By Fast Talking.
Definition: Moving from idea to idea quickly so audience can't think.
Psychological note: Some research suggests people must briefly believe what they hear to understand it. Rapid delivery prevents rejection.
Definition: Reasoning in circle; thing to be proved is used as assumption.
Examples:
Definition: Using what you're trying to disprove.
Examples:
Related: Begging The Question, but about what you're trying to disprove.
Contrast: Reductio Ad Absurdum (temporarily assumes truth to show absurdity).
Definition: Claiming two situations are highly similar when they aren't.
Examples:
Definition: Two things both analogous to third thing, therefore analogous to each other.
Example: "You wouldn't have supported law-breaking by Martin Luther King, would you?" → "Are you saying this issue is as important as civil rights? How dare you!"
Hitler Example: "Hitler believed X; you believe X; therefore you're like Hitler" (But Hitler believed drapes should reach floor - does that make it evil?)
Definition: Resemblance is proof of relationship.
Example: Spotting plane by noticing "little man in cockpit, just like model airplane".
Definition: Abstract thing talked about as if concrete.
Example: "Nature abhors a vacuum"
Definition: Assuming because two things happened, first caused second (sequence ≠ causation).
Examples:
Definition: Things that vary together must cause each other.
Examples:
Definition: Using arguments that support position while ignoring/disallowing arguments against.
Example: Claiming unbelievers make you unable to demonstrate abilities.
Definition: Omitting crucial information.
Examples:
Definition: Counting hits, forgetting misses.
Examples:
Definition: Rebut weakest argument, claim opponent made weak case overall.
Note: Overlooks strong arguments while focusing on weak ones.
Definition: Broad conclusion from small, possibly unrepresentative sample.
Examples:
Definition: Assuming small numbers = big numbers.
Examples:
Definition: Assuming general truth applies in every case.
Examples:
Definition: Assuming whole has same simplicity as constituent parts.
Examples:
Note: Science studies emergent properties.
Definition: Assuming what's true of whole is true of each part.
Example: "Humans made of atoms; humans conscious; so atoms conscious"
Definition: Wrong because it's next to something wrong, or could slide toward wrong.
Examples:
Definition: When opponent addresses point, demand they address further point.
Example: Successfully defend gun position → must now defend knife position → must defend martial arts → etc.
Variation: Lowering bar (predicted prevention doesn't happen → claim mitigation instead).
Definition: If arguer doesn't understand topic, concludes nobody does, so opinions equally valid.
Definition: Using big words to seem expert.
Example: "Utilize" instead of "use"
Definition: Extreme prestigious jargon; invented vocabulary.
Example: "Each autonomous individual emerges holographically within egoless ontological consciousness as non-dimensional geometric point within transcendental thought-wave matrix"
Sources: Copying style without meaning; snow job; poetic language.
Definition: Using word to mean one thing, then using it to mean something different.
Examples:
Definition: Using words that sound better.
Examples:
Definition: Word changes to claim new concept rather than soften old.
Examples:
Definition: Different standards for similar cases.
Example: "Declining metrics in System A = A's failure" vs. "Similar metrics in System B ≠ B's failure"
Definition: Two contradictory claims in same argument.
Example: "I never borrowed his car, and it had that dent when I got it"
Definition: Not understanding basic statistical concepts.
Examples:
Definition: Logic reversal: "If P then Q" becomes "Q therefore P"
Examples:
Definition: Conclusion doesn't follow.
Examples:
Definition: Many people believe it, so it must be true.
Valid For: Social conventions ("good manners")
Invalid For: Facts (popular beliefs can be wrong)
Definition: Using wise saying as if proven, with no exceptions.
Definition: Say something often enough, people believe it.
Definition: Refusing to accept after everyone else convinced.
Definition: If argument has particular origin, it must be right (or wrong).
Problem: Origin doesn't determine correctness.
Definition: Assuming spectrum ends are same since you can travel in small steps.
Example: "Clean-shaven = big beard (since in-between exists)"
Counter: Pink existing doesn't undermine distinction between white and red.
Definition: Claiming "common sense" answers exist when they don't.
Problem: Common sense depends on context, knowledge, experience.
Definition: Ignoring reasonable explanations for desired one.
Example: "Left milk out. In morning, gone. Clearly, fairies visited."
Occam's Razor: Simplest explanation is best; don't introduce new concepts (fairies) when old ones (cats) work.
Definition: Telling story tying unrelated material, using story as proof they're related.
Definition: Arguing from something that might have happened but didn't.
Definition: Showing opponent's argument leads to absurd conclusion.
Valid When: Properly applied to show logical consequence.
Invalid When: Only showing argument doesn't apply in ALL cases.
Definition: If you don't understand debate, "fair" to split difference.
Problem: One side possibly wrong; could suspend judgment instead.
Example: "Some say sun rises east, some say west; truth probably in between"
Definition: Claiming idea proved/disproved by pivotal discovery.
Problem: "Smoking gun" history is soundbite distortion.
Reality: Background first, buttressing after.
Definition: Answering wrongdoing charge by saying others have sinned.
Examples:
Definition: Fraud to accomplish good end; end justifies means.
In Debates: Shaded, distorted, or fabricated assertion by emotionally committed speaker.
Definition: Simply being wrong about facts.
Note: One error usually means more errors to find.
Definition: "I don't see how this is possible, so it isn't"
Definition: Intentional Errors of Fact.
Definition: Espousing something generally ill-regarded or disproven.
Motivations: Make people think, needling, external agenda, oppose conformity, ego.
Note: Being contrarian doesn't make you wrong, but if position ill-regarded for reason, defense is uphill.
Definition: Statement unclear enough to leave leeway.
Definition: Making enough attacks/questions to never define your position.
Definition: Giving old information, not latest.
Definition: Speaker has information there's no way to get based on their statements.
Definition: Almost claiming something but backing out.
Definition: Questions with no valid answer.
Example: Irresistible forces meeting immovable objects.
Definition: Conclusion reached fallaciously, so incorrectly declared wrong.
Note: Different from Reductio Ad Absurdum.
Source: This comprehensive fallacy list was compiled from the Don Lindsay Archive's "A List of Fallacious Arguments." The original website (don-lindsay-archive.org) is no longer accessible, including via archive.org.
Original Attribution: The Don Lindsay Archive credited these fallacy definitions to the work of logicians and critical thinking educators, drawing particularly from:
Purpose: This reference is preserved here for educational purposes to support critical thinking, media literacy, and resistance to manipulation in public discourse.
For More Information: This reference guide accompanies the essay "Think for Yourself: A Citizen's Guide to Fallacy Literacy" which explores why understanding these patterns matters for democratic participation.
Last Updated: January 2026